I think Roweco should stand his ground.It appears that the term ‘sold as seen without warranty’ is acceptable in the building industry.For example if you look at Altrad Belle who are national and suppliers to the construction industry.They are advertising plenty of ex demo and used machinery ‘ sold as seen without warranty’.In which case I would like to know how Roweco cannot do the same especially as this car was not his ‘ stock in trade ‘ as is the case with Altrad Belle.